Evaluation Of Medical Students’ Awareness, Attitudes, And Preferences Regarding Teledermatology

Evaluation Of Medical Students’ Awareness, Attitudes, And Preferences Regarding Teledermatology

Authors

  • Zekiye Kanat Inonu University School of Medicine Department of Dermatology
  • Dursun Türkmen Department of Dermatology, İnönü University, School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
  • Nihal Altunışık Department of Dermatology, İnönü University, School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
  • Serpil Şener Department of Dermatology, İnönü University, School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey

Keywords:

TELEDERMATOLOGY, Medical Students , Medical Education

Abstract

Introduction: Teledermatology enables remote evaluation of dermatological conditions through digital imaging and communication technologies and is considered particularly feasible due to the visual nature of dermatological examination.
Objectives: To assess medical students’ awareness, knowledge, attitudes, experiences, and preferences regarding teledermatology.
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study included 286 medical students. Data were collected via a questionnaire developed from the literature and reviewed by dermatologists, administered both online and face-to-face. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0. Categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-square test, with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The mean age was 20.38 ± 1.68 years, with equal sex distribution. Overall, 50.3% had never heard of teledermatology, and only 32.2% were familiar with it. Most participants (76.2%) did not believe teledermatology could match face-to-face diagnostic accuracy. Support for official implementation was 30.8%, while 26.9% preferred teledermatological consultation. Only 4.5% had prior experience. Reported advantages included improved access to dermatologists (70.6%), increased patient evaluation capacity (56.3%), and reduced cost and time (54.5%). Disadvantages included misdiagnosis risk (72.7%), reliance on technical infrastructure (39.2%), and image quality issues (37.8%). Sex differences were significant only for misdiagnosis perception (P=0.001). Awareness increased with age (P=0.000), and prior awareness influenced preferences (P=0.012). No association was found with class level or economic status.
Conclusions: Medical students show limited awareness but generally positive attitudes toward teledermatology. Concerns include infrastructure, image quality, and diagnostic reliability. Integrating telemedicine training into medical curricula may improve knowledge, confidence, and adoption.

References

Yıldız H, Abuaf KÖ, Bilgili ME. The Use of Teledermatology in Daily Practices Among Dermatologists in Turkey. Turk J Dermatol 2014; 1: 7-11. DOI: 10.4274/tdd.1526

Perednia DA, Brown NA. Teledermatology: One Application of Telemedicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995;83(1):42-7.

Kaliyadan F, Ramsey ML. Teledermatology. 2022 Oct 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 29083682.

Kazi R, Evankovich MR, Liu R, et al. Utilization of Asynchronous and Synchronous Teledermatology in a Large Health Care System During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(7):771-777. DOI:10.1089/tmj.2020.0299

Loh CH, Chong Tam SY, Oh CC. Teledermatology in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. JAAD Int. 2021 Dec;5:54-64. DOI:: 10.1016/j.jdin.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Aug 2. PMID: 34368789; PMCID: PMC8326016.

Latifi R, Doarn CR. Perspective on COVID-19: Finally, Telemedicine at Center Stage. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(9):1106-1109. DOI:10.1089/tmj.2020.0132

Massone C, Brunasso AM, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Gulia A, Soyer HP. Teledermoscopy: education, discussion forums, teleconsulting and mobile teledermoscopy. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2010;145(1):127-132.

Ruggiero A, Martora F, Fabbrocini G, et al. The Role of Teledermatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:2785-2793. Published 2022 Dec 19. DOI:10.2147/CCID.S377029

Patrzyk S, Bielecki W, Woźniacka A. A study of attitudes among Polish dermatologists and dermatology trainees regarding modern technologies in medicine. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022;39(3):531-537. DOI:10.5114/ada.2022.117738

Marasca C, Annunziata MC, Camela E, et al. Teledermatology and Inflammatory Skin Conditions during COVID-19 Era: New Perspectives and Applications. J Clin Med. 2022;11(6):1511. Published 2022 Mar 10. DOI:10.3390/jcm11061511

Whited JD. Teledermatology. Current status and future directions. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(2):59-64. DOI:10.2165/00128071-200102020-00001

Sharma A, Jindal V, Singla P, Goldust M, Mhatre M. Will teledermatology be the silver lining during and after COVID-19?. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(4):e13643. DOI:10.1111/dth.13643

Mashoudy, K.D., Perez, S.M. & Nouri, K. From diagnosis to intervention: a review of telemedicine's role in skin cancer care. Arch Dermatol Res. 316, 139 (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02884-7

Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, et al. Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(5):309-313. DOI:10.1177/1357633X20916567

Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736-771. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006

Altunisik N, Gencoglu S, Turkmen D, Sener S. Assessing Public Awareness and Perception of Teledermatology Via Survey. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Jan 1;14(1):e2024093. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1401a93. PMID: 38236994; PMCID: PMC10868884.

https://turkdermatoloji.org.tr/haber_arsivi/detay/686

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Kanat Z, Türkmen D, Altunışık N, Şener S. Evaluation Of Medical Students’ Awareness, Attitudes, And Preferences Regarding Teledermatology. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2026;16(2):6687. doi:10.5826/dpc.1602a6687

Share