GRINCH Index: Measuring Patient Satisfaction During Christmas Holiday Gift Programs
Keywords:
patients’ satisfaction, GRINCH, gifts, medical reputationAbstract
Introduction: Receiving gifts, especially during the Christmas festivities, is a common experience for healthcare providers. Gift-giving, being a spontaneous expression of gratitude, could enable the assessment of true patient satisfaction.
Objective: In this study we used the Gifts Received durINg Christmas Holidays (GRINCH) as a potential index of patient satisfaction.
Methods: GRINCH is an Italian national survey that started on 13 December 2022 and lasted until 6 January 2023. Fifty dermatologists, equally divided between males and females working in university hospitals, general hospitals, or private or public offices and covering almost all the Italian regions participated in data collection. The participants were asked to fill out a structured data sheet collecting the type and the estimated gift value, the demographic characteristics of the patient, and the type of condition that led the patient to seek medical attention.
Results: A total of 659 gifts were recorded during the study period. The mean ratio of gifts/dermatologist, GRINCH index, was 13.7. Notably, the Grinch index increased as the dermatologists’ ages increased in both sexes, and the same trend was confirmed by the data concerning the doctors’ number of years of professional activity. We observed a greater mean GRINCH value in male dermatologists compared to their female colleagues. Patients with chronic diseases were more prone to gifting; those affected by psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, or acne showed above-average GRINCH values. However, this finding seems unrelated to the dermatologist's field of expertise.
Conclusion: Overall, these data strongly underline the importance of the doctor-patient relationship. A structured and prolonged mutual knowledge determines a trustful relationship that appears to be one of the fundamental bases of patient satisfaction.
References
7° Rapporto GIMBE sul Servizio Sanitario Nazionale. https://salviamo-ssn.it/var/contenuti/7_Rapporto_GIMBE_SSN.pdf. Accessed on May 2025.Coffee N. Gift and Gain: How Money Transformed Ancient Rome. Classical Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press. 2017. xiv, 296. ISBN 9780190496432.
Crawford MJ, Kessel AS. Not listening to patients--the use and misuse of patient satisfaction studies. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):1-6. DOI:10.1177/002076409904500101. PMID: 10443244
McAuliffe E, MacLachlan M. Clinicians′ Resistance to Consumer Satisfaction Surveys: What They Never Tell You. J. Manag. Med. 1992;6(3):47-51.
Merrill CarlsmithJ., Aronson E. "Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectances. J Abnorm Soc Psychol.1963;66(2):151.
Williams B, Wilkinson G. Patient satisfaction in mental health care. Evaluating an evaluative method. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;166(5):559-562. DOI:10.1192/bjp.166.5.559.
Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. DOI:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6. PMID: 10245370.
Locker D, Dunt D. Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. Soc Sci Med (1967). 1978;12(4A):283-292. PMID: 675282.
Ng JHY, Luk BHK. Patient satisfaction: Concept analysis in the healthcare context. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(4):790-796. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.013
Ferreira PL, Raposo V, Tavares AI. Primary health care patient satisfaction: Explanatory factors and geographic characteristics. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020;32(2):93-98. DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzz134. PMID: 32047931
Zolkefli Y. Healthcare Dilemma Towards Gift Giving by Patients. Malays J Med Sci. 2021;28(5):137-141. DOI:10.21315/mjms2021.28.5.14. PMID: 35115896.
Lyckholm LJ. Should physicians accept gifts from patients?. JAMA. 1998;280(22):1944-1946. DOI:10.1001/jama.280.22.1944.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giulio Gualdi, Laura Bigi, Clara De Simone, Paolo Amerio, Francesco Loconsole, Federico Bardazzi, Lidia Sacchelli, Michela Starace, Andrea Conti, Manuela Baldari, Anna Balato, Giovanna Brunasso, Giacomo Caldarola, Anna Campanati, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Claudio Guarneri, Piergiorgio Malagoli, Andrea Paradisi, Francesca Prignano, Mario Puviani, Valentina Dini, Simone Soglia, Ilaria Salvi, Martina Burlando

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.

