Artificial Intelligence versus Human Assessment in the Treatment of Upper Facial Wrinkles with Abobotulinum Toxin A
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, dermatology, facial wrinkling, abobotulinum toxinAAbstract
Introduction: Botulinum toxin is widely used to treat upper facial wrinkles, and its efficacy is typically assessed through photographic comparisons and standardized scales. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into aesthetic dermatology for objective wrinkle evaluation.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare human and AI-based assessments of pre- and posttreatment of upper facial wrinkles and evaluate their consistency and treatment effectiveness.
Methods: A total of 228 individuals (204 females, 24 males) who received abobotulinum toxin for glabellar, forehead, and lateral canthal wrinkles were analyzed using pre- and posttreatment photographs. Wrinkles were assessed by four human raters using the 5-point Merz scale and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). AI evaluations were conducted using Haut.AI Face Skin Metrics 2.0, a pre-trained machine learning platform.
Results: AI had better error rates than humans for age prediction. The AI and human assessments showed high agreement for static and dynamic wrinkle evaluations (P<0.001). Posttreatment analysis indicated significant wrinkle reduction in both the human and AI assessments (P<0.001). Human assessment of GAIS scores was negatively correlated with wrinkle reduction (P<0.001). The treatment effects measured by AI and human raters showed a weak-to-moderate correlation.
Conclusion: AI-based assessments align well with human evaluations and can detect posttreatment improvements. However, the treatment effect did not correlate well with human evaluations. AI can serve as an objective tool for evaluating botulinum toxin treatment outcomes and complementing human assessments. However, there is still a need for a gold standard method to evaluate aesthetic improvement and harmony.
References
Ong AA, Sherris DA. Neurotoxins. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35(3):230-8. DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1688844. PMID: 31189195
Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(6):1735-50; discussion 51-2. DOI:10.1097/00006534-200111000-00048. PMID: 11711957
Carruthers A, Carruthers J. A validated facial grading scale: the future of facial ageing measurement tools? J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(5):235-41. DOI:10.3109/14764172.2010.514920. PMID: 20825260
Lim T, Kerscher M, Ogilvie A, et al. Novel Validated Five-point Photonumeric Scales for Assessment of Static and Dynamic Forehead Lines. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(9):e5287. DOI:10.1097/gox.0000000000005287. PMID: 37744770
Frank K, Day D, Few J, et al. AI assistance in aesthetic medicine-A consensus on objective medical standards. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024. DOI:10.1111/jocd.16481. PMID: 39091136
Elder A, Cappelli MO, Ring C, Saedi N. Artificial intelligence in cosmetic dermatology: An update on current trends. Clin Dermatol. 2024;42(3):216-20. DOI:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.12.015. PMID: 38181887
Kania B, Montecinos K, Goldberg DJ. Artificial intelligence in cosmetic dermatology. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;23(10):3305-11. DOI:10.1111/jocd.16538. PMID: 39188183
Elder A, Ring C, Heitmiller K, Gabriel Z, Saedi N. The role of artificial intelligence in cosmetic dermatology-Current, upcoming, and future trends. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(1):48-52. DOI:10.1111/jocd.13797. PMID: 33151612
Ahmadi N, Niazmand M, Ghasemi A, Mohaghegh S, Motamedian SR. Applications of Machine Learning in Facial Cosmetic Surgeries: A Scoping Review. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2023;47(4):1377-93. DOI:10.1007/S00266-023-03379-Y. PMID: 37277660
Georgievskaya A. Artificial Intelligence Confirming Treatment Success: The Role of Gender- and Age-Specific Scales in Performance Evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(4 Suppl):34s-40s. DOI:10.1097/prs.0000000000009671. PMID: 36170434
Georgievskaya A, Tlyachev T, Kiselev K, et al. Predicting human chronological age via AI analysis of dorsal hand versus facial images: A study in a cohort of Indian females. Experimental Dermatology. 2024;33(3):e15045. DOI: 10.1111/exd.15045. PMID: 38509744
Zhang BH, Chen K, Lu SM, et al. Turning Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence Recognition of Age Reduction after Face-Lift Surgery Correlates with Patient Satisfaction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2021;148(1):45-54. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008020. PMID: 34181603
Du H, Liang H, Peng B, Qi Z, Jin X. Age Reduction After Face-Lift Surgery in Chinese Population: An Outcome Study Using Artificial Intelligence and Objective Observer-Based Assessment. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04258-w. PMID: 39085528
Gibstein AR, Chen K, Nakfoor B, et al. Facelift Surgery Turns Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence and Patient Satisfaction Quantitate Value of Procedure Type and Specific Techniques. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(9):987-99. DOI:10.1093/asj/sjaa238. PMID: 33217756
Goodyear K, Saffari PS, Esfandiari M, Baugh S, Rootman DB, Karlin JN. Estimating apparent age using artificial intelligence: Quantifying the effect of blepharoplasty. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2023;85:336-43. DOI:10.1016/J.BJPS.2023.07.017. PMID: 37543022
Elliott ZT, Bheemreddy A, Fiorella M, et al. Artificial intelligence for objectively measuring years regained after facial rejuvenation surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023;44(2):103775. DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103775. PMID: 36706713
Bobrov E, Georgievskaya A, Kiselev K, et al. PhotoAgeClock: deep learning algorithms for development of non-invasive visual biomarkers of aging. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10(11):3249-59. DOI:10.18632/aging.101629. PMID: 30414596
Fujino S, Iwanaga T. Real-time wrinkle evaluation method using Visual Illusion-based image feature enhancement System. Skin Res Technol. 2023;29(1):e13206. DOI:10.1111/srt.13206. PMID: 36382793
Osman OF, Elbashir RMI, Abbass IE, Kendrick C, Goyal M, Yap MH. Automated assessment of facial wrinkling: A case study on the effect of smoking. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2017. 2017;2017-January:1081-6. DOI:10.1109/SMC.2017.8122755. PMID: -
Flament F, Jacquet L, Ye C, et al. Artificial Intelligence analysis of over half a million European and Chinese women reveals striking differences in the facial skin ageing process. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2022;36(7):1136-42. DOI:10.1111/JDV.18073. PMID: 35279898
Flament F, Zhang Y, Jiang R, et al. Objective and automatic grading system of facial signs from selfie pictures of South African women: Characterization of changes with age and sun-exposures. Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI). 2022;28(4):596-603. DOI:10.1111/SRT.13153. PMID: 35490368
Park H, Park SR, Lee S, et al. Development and application of artificial intelligence-based facial skin image diagnosis system: Changes in facial skin characteristics with ageing in Korean women. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2024;46(2):199-208. DOI:10.1111/ics.12924. PMID: 37881146
Flament F, Velleman D, Yamashita E, et al. Japanese experiment of a complete and objective automatic grading system of facial signs from selfie pictures: Validation with dermatologists and characterization of changes due to age and sun exposures. Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI). 2021;27(4):544-53. DOI:10.1111/SRT.12982. PMID: 33368725
Sattler S, Frank K, Kerscher M, et al. Objective Facial Assessment With Artificial Intelligence: Introducing the Facial Aesthetic Index and Facial Youthfulness Index. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):e52-e4. DOI:10.36849/jdd.7080. PMID: 38206157
Landau M, Goldust M. Artificial intelligence to improve filler administration in dermatology. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;23(9):3045-6. DOI:10.1111/jocd.16472. PMID: 39015042
Flament F, Maudet A, Ye C, et al. Comparing the self-perceived effects of a facial anti-aging product to those automatically detected from selfie images of Chinese women of different ages and cities. Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI). 2021;27(5):880-90. DOI:10.1111/SRT.13037. PMID: 33822402
Yoelin S, Green JB, Dhawan SS, et al. The Use of a Novel Artificial Intelligence Platform for the Evaluation of Rhytids. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2022;42(11):NP688-NP94. DOI:10.1093/ASJ/SJAC200. PMID: 35869540
Yoon W, Shin HK. Efficacy of artificial intelligence-based skin analysis for calculating wrinkle improvement and skin firmness after simultaneous radiofrequency and high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy: a retrospective clinical study. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;31(2):46-54. DOI:10.14730/aaps.2025.01340.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadir Küçük, Dilara İlhan Erdil, Fatmanur Hacinecipoğlu, Gökçen Çelik, Selda Pelin Kartal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.
How to Cite
Share
